New research has outlined how to use a new technique to study epigenetic changes in cells and tissues.
A study published in Nature Communications, is the first to systematically compare the new method called CUT&Tag to the existing standard, and could serve as guidelines for other researchers wanting to design their own epigenetic studies.
"We hope that this work will provide useful guidelines for anyone working in the field, particularly those interested in profiling histone modifications, in carrying out future epigenetic research." Dr Sarah Marzi Department of Brain Sciences and UK DRI
Scientists are developing better ways to study gene regulation – the process through which the expression of genes is controlled by cells. Traditionally, researchers have used a method called ChIP-seq to profile histone modifications, a type of gene regulation mechanism. However, a newer technique called CUT&Tag is gaining popularity because it is more sensitive and cheaper than ChIP-seq, and works well with single cells.
To date, there has been no comprehensive study of how best to undertake CUT&Tag experiments and analyse the resulting data. In this study, the researchers aimed to benchmark CUT&Tag against the standard method, to understand how comparable the technique is.
Dr Sarah Marzi, Honorary Senior Lecturer at the Department of Brain Sciences said: "We hope that this work will provide useful guidelines for anyone working in the field, particularly those interested in profiling histone modifications, in carrying out future epigenetic research."
To understand how reliable CUT&Tag is, researchers compared it to ChIP-seq using data from a well-known database known as ENCODE, in human cells. They checked how much overlap there was between the two methods, how well their signals matched, and whether they identified the same important regions of DNA related to gene regulation and protein binding. They found that CUT&Tag was able to detect just over half of the same DNA-protein interaction sites identified by ChIP-seq.
This study provides the first systematic comparison of the two most widely used techniques to analyse histone modifications. While the two approaches are not completely identical, CUT&Tag captures the most significant and strongest signals in the data, as compared to ChIP-seq.
The team provide results of their experimental and computational optimisations, which can serve as guidelines for other researchers wanting to profile histone modification.
Dr Marzi said: “This study aimed to make a judgment about how comparable these two methods are – at first glance not very highly – as CUT&Tag only captures just over half of the same data points. But we were reassured as it does capture the most significant and strongest peaks, and shows very similar enrichments in regulatory elements, functional annotations and transcription factor binding sites.
We hope that this work will provide useful guidelines for anyone working in the field, particularly those interested in profiling histone modifications, in carrying out future epigenetic research.”
This article has been reproduced based on a UK Dementia Research Institute news story.
Reference: Abbasova, L., Urbanaviciute, P., Hu, D. et al. CUT&Tag recovers up to half of ENCODE ChIP-seq histone acetylation peaks. Nat Commun 16, 2993 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58137-2
Article text (excluding photos or graphics) © Imperial College London.
Photos and graphics subject to third party copyright used with permission or © Imperial College London.
Reporter
Meesha Patel
Faculty of Medicine Centre
Contact details
Tel: +44 (0)20 7594 7909
Email: meesha.patel17@imperial.ac.uk
Show all stories by this author
