Imperial College London

ProfessorAlanHeavens

Faculty of Natural SciencesDepartment of Physics

Chair in Astrostatistics
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 2930a.heavens Website

 
 
//

Location

 

1018EBlackett LaboratorySouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Percival:2022:mnras/stab3540,
author = {Percival, WJ and Friedrich, O and Sellentin, E and Heavens, A},
doi = {mnras/stab3540},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
pages = {3207--3221},
title = {Matching Bayesian and frequentist coverage probabilities when using an approximate data covariance matrix},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3540},
volume = {510},
year = {2022}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Observational astrophysics consists of making inferences about the Universe by comparing data and models. The credible intervals placed on model parameters are often as important as the maximum a posteriori probability values, as the intervals indicate concordance or discordance between models and with measurements from other data. Intermediate statistics (e.g. the power spectrum) are usually measured and inferences are made by fitting models to these rather than the raw data, assuming that the likelihood for these statistics has multivariate Gaussian form. The covariance matrix used to calculate the likelihood is often estimated from simulations, such that it is itself a random variable. This is a standard problem in Bayesian statistics, which requires a prior to be placed on the true model parameters and covariance matrix, influencing the joint posterior distribution. As an alternative to the commonly used independence Jeffreys prior, we introduce a prior that leads to a posterior that has approximately frequentist matching coverage. This is achieved by matching the covariance of the posterior to that of the distribution of true values of the parameters around the maximum likelihood values in repeated trials, under certain assumptions. Using this prior, credible intervals derived from a Bayesian analysis can be interpreted approximately as confidence intervals, containing the truth a certain proportion of the time for repeated trials. Linking frequentist and Bayesian approaches that have previously appeared in the astronomical literature, this offers a consistent and conservative approach for credible intervals quoted on model parameters for problems where the covariance matrix is itself an estimate.
AU - Percival,WJ
AU - Friedrich,O
AU - Sellentin,E
AU - Heavens,A
DO - mnras/stab3540
EP - 3221
PY - 2022///
SN - 0035-8711
SP - 3207
TI - Matching Bayesian and frequentist coverage probabilities when using an approximate data covariance matrix
T2 - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3540
UR - http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000749577000006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
UR - https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/510/3/3207/6449384?login=true
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/95938
VL - 510
ER -