In this section
@inproceedings{Dejl:2021,
author = {Dejl, A and He, P and Mangal, P and Mohsin, H and Surdu, B and Voinea, E and Albini, E and Lertvittayakumjorn, P and Rago, A and Toni, F},
pages = {1749--1751},
title = {Argflow: A toolkit for deep argumentative explanations for neural networks},
url = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3463952.3464229},
year = {2021}
}
TY - CPAPER
AB - In recent years, machine learning (ML) models have been successfully applied in a variety of real-world applications. However, they are often complex and incomprehensible to human users. This can decrease trust in their outputs and render their usage in critical settings ethically problematic. As a result, several methods for explaining such ML models have been proposed recently, in particular for black-box models such as deep neural networks (NNs). Nevertheless, these methods predominantly explain outputs in terms of inputs, disregarding the inner workings of the ML model computing those outputs. We present Argflow, a toolkit enabling the generation of a variety of 'deep' argumentative explanations (DAXs) for outputs of NNs on classification tasks.
AU - Dejl,A
AU - He,P
AU - Mangal,P
AU - Mohsin,H
AU - Surdu,B
AU - Voinea,E
AU - Albini,E
AU - Lertvittayakumjorn,P
AU - Rago,A
AU - Toni,F
EP - 1751
PY - 2021///
SN - 1548-8403
SP - 1749
TI - Argflow: A toolkit for deep argumentative explanations for neural networks
UR - https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3463952.3464229
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/104668
ER -