Responsible Engineering, Design & Innovation (REDI)

Which way forward?

 

With the advent of technology that can learn and change itself, and the integration of vast data sources tracking every detail of human lives, engineering now entails decision-making with complex moral implications and global impact.  As part of daily practice, technologists face values-laden tensions concerning privacy, justice, transparency, wellbeing, human rights, and questions that strike at the very nature of what it is to be human.

We recently edited a Special Issue of IEEE Transaction on Technology and Society about “After Covid-19: Crises, Ethics, and Socio-Technical Change”

"Our research works to understand the paths toward a future in which technology benefits all of humankind and the planet. We collaborate with social scientists to develop practical methods and socio-technical solutions to equip engineers and designers with the tools necessary for practicing responsibly through every step of the development process. "

Partners

Centre for the Future of Intelligence

We are core members of the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, an AI Ethics research centre bringing together world leading AI researchers in technology and the social sciences and based at Imperial College London, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford and University of California, Berkeley.

Go to website

Digital Catapult

Rafael Calvo is a member of Digital Catapult's 'Machine intelligence Garage' Ethics Committee, which was created to convene experts in AI and data ethics to 1. oversee the development of principles and tools to facilitate responsible AI in practice, and 2. work closely with startups developing through Digital Catapult’s Machine Intelligence Garage programme.

Go to website

Projects

UNESCO - The Future of Work

Professor Rafael Calvo is working with an international team of researchers in industrial relations, psychology, history, education and sociology on advising UNESCO in relation to the future of education and work in a world of AI and uncertainty.

Report

AI, Bias & Disability

New technologies can advance the lives of people with disabilities, but evidence is emerging that some AI may be entrenching bias or even generating new forms of injustice. For the research project "Designing AI to stop disability bias" we have partnered with colleagues at NTU in Singapore to ensure responsible AI in relation to people with disabilities.

Project Website

Responsible AI in the workplace

We work on designing technologies in ways that support precisely these factors that fuel motivation, engagement and wellbeing and we have methods for conducting design and research together with the people impacted. Our experience in doing so has made it clear that without addressing this human psychological layer, even the cleverest technology can fail.

Find out more

Culturally Appropriate Language Models and Systems (CALMS)

The Imperial team is working together with rural communities across four distinct regions of Peru to co-design responsible technologies that can help improve dementia care. This includes creating a dementia screening tool and an intervention program to support informal carers. The aim is to develop effective, accessible, and culturally sensitive solutions that can address the unique challenges posed by dementia in low- and middle-income countries.

Find out more

Responsible Tech Design Library

Find out more about tools and methods for more ethical practice in technology design

Staff

Prof. Rafael Calvo

Rafael Calvo

Prof. Rafael Calvo

Dr Celine Mougenot

Celine Mougenot

Dr Celine Mougenot

Prof. Sebastian Deterding

Prof. Sebastian Deterding

Dr Fangzhou You

Dr Fangzhou You

Laura Moradbakhti

Laura Moradbakhti

Dr Juan Pablo Bermudez

Juan Pablo Bermudez

Dr Juan Pablo Bermudez

Marco Da Re

Marco Da Re

Citation

BibTex format

@inbook{Calvo:2020:10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_2,
author = {Calvo, RA and Peters, D and Vold, K and Ryan, RM},
booktitle = {Philosophical Studies Series},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_2},
pages = {31--54},
title = {Supporting Human Autonomy in AI Systems: A Framework for Ethical Enquiry},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_2},
year = {2020}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - CHAP
AB  - Autonomy has been central to moral and political philosophy for millennia, and has been positioned as a critical aspect of both justice and wellbeing. Research in psychology supports this position, providing empirical evidence that autonomy is critical to motivation, personal growth and psychological wellness. Responsible AI will require an understanding of, and ability to effectively design for, human autonomy (rather than just machine autonomy) if it is to genuinely benefit humanity. Yet the effects on human autonomy of digital experiences are neither straightforward nor consistent, and are complicated by commercial interests and tensions around compulsive overuse. This multi-layered reality requires an analysis that is itself multidimensional and that takes into account human experience at various levels of resolution. We borrow from HCI and psychological research to apply a model (“METUX”) that identifies six distinct spheres of technology experience. We demonstrate the value of the model for understanding human autonomy in a technology ethics context at multiple levels by applying it to the real-world case study of an AI-enhanced video recommender system. In the process we argue for the following three claims: (1) There are autonomy-related consequences to algorithms representing the interests of third parties, and they are not impartial and rational extensions of the self, as is often perceived; (2) Designing for autonomy is an ethical imperative critical to the future design of responsible AI; and (3) Autonomy-support must be analysed from at least six spheres of experience in order to appropriately capture contradictory and downstream effects.
AU  - Calvo,RA
AU  - Peters,D
AU  - Vold,K
AU  - Ryan,RM
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_2
EP  - 54
PY  - 2020///
SP  - 31
TI  - Supporting Human Autonomy in AI Systems: A Framework for Ethical Enquiry
T1  - Philosophical Studies Series
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_2
ER  -
Download