Search or filter publications

Search publications Search

Filter by type:

Filter by publication type

• Book
• Book chapter
• Conference paper
• Journal article
• Patent
• Report
• Software

Filter by year:

Filter from 2023202220212020 to Filter to 2023202220212020

---

Search results

• Journal article
  Peters D, Vold K, Robinson D, Calvo Ret al., 2020,

  Responsible AI—two frameworks for ethical design practice

  , IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, Vol: 1, Pages: 34-47, ISSN: 2637-6415

  In 2019, the IEEE launched the P7000 standards projects intended to address ethical issues in the design of autonomous and intelligent systems. This move came amidst a growing public concern over the unintended consequences of artificial intelligence (AI), compounded by the lack of an anticipatory process for attending to ethical impact within professional practice. However, the difficulty in moving from principles to practice presents a significant challenge to the implementation of ethical guidelines. Herein, we describe two complementary frameworks for integrating ethical analysis into engineering practice to help address this challenge. We then provide the outcomes of an ethical analysis informed by these frameworks, conducted within the specific context of Internet-delivered therapy in digital mental health. We hope both the frameworks and analysis can provide tools and insights, not only for the context of digital healthcare but also for data-enabled and intelligent technology development more broadly.

  • Abstract
  • Publisher Web Link
  • Open Access Link
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Calvo RA, Peters D, Cave S, 2020,

  Advancing impact assessment for intelligent systems

  , Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol: 2, Pages: 89-91, ISSN: 2522-5839
  • Publisher Web Link
  • Open Access Link
  • Cite
• Book chapter
  Calvo RA, Peters D, Vold K, Ryan RMet al., 2020,

  Supporting Human Autonomy in AI Systems: A Framework for Ethical Enquiry

  , Philosophical Studies Series, Pages: 31-54

  Autonomy has been central to moral and political philosophy for millennia, and has been positioned as a critical aspect of both justice and wellbeing. Research in psychology supports this position, providing empirical evidence that autonomy is critical to motivation, personal growth and psychological wellness. Responsible AI will require an understanding of, and ability to effectively design for, human autonomy (rather than just machine autonomy) if it is to genuinely benefit humanity. Yet the effects on human autonomy of digital experiences are neither straightforward nor consistent, and are complicated by commercial interests and tensions around compulsive overuse. This multi-layered reality requires an analysis that is itself multidimensional and that takes into account human experience at various levels of resolution. We borrow from HCI and psychological research to apply a model (“METUX”) that identifies six distinct spheres of technology experience. We demonstrate the value of the model for understanding human autonomy in a technology ethics context at multiple levels by applying it to the real-world case study of an AI-enhanced video recommender system. In the process we argue for the following three claims: (1) There are autonomy-related consequences to algorithms representing the interests of third parties, and they are not impartial and rational extensions of the self, as is often perceived; (2) Designing for autonomy is an ethical imperative critical to the future design of responsible AI; and (3) Autonomy-support must be analysed from at least six spheres of experience in order to appropriately capture contradictory and downstream effects.

  • Abstract
  • Cite
  • Citations: 50

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.