In this section
@inproceedings{Martınez-Sanz:2016:10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741970,
author = {Martnez-Sanz, IM and Chaudhuri, B and Junyent-Ferre, A and Trovato, V and Strbac, G},
doi = {10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741970},
publisher = {IEEE},
title = {Distributed vs. Concentrated Rapid Frequency Response Provision in Future Great Britain System},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741970},
year = {2016}
}
TY - CPAPER
AB - Two major sources of rapid frequency response(RFR) to counter the reducing system inertia problem of theGreat Britain (GB) system are “synthetic inertia” from windturbines and fast demand response (FDR). In this paper, weconsider a future low inertia scenario to show the effectivenessof RFR provision from the large offshore wind farms (OWFs)planned in the North Sea (concentrated response) against FDRfrom loads spread across the GB system (distributed response).The spatial variation in transient frequencies, which can bepronounced in the aftermath of a disturbance and is criticalfor the response activation of these actuators, is accounted. Casestudies using a reduced GB system model show the effectivenessof distributed FDR and concentrated support from OWFs inproviding RFR when disturbances occur in different areas of thesystem where different inertia levels are present.
AU - Martnez-Sanz,IM
AU - Chaudhuri,B
AU - Junyent-Ferre,A
AU - Trovato,V
AU - Strbac,G
DO - 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741970
PB - IEEE
PY - 2016///
SN - 1944-9933
TI - Distributed vs. Concentrated Rapid Frequency Response Provision in Future Great Britain System
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741970
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/31071
ER -