For analysis of Imperial’s overall results and of each unit of assessment the College submitted to, staff and students should visit the analysis section, or click on the tabs below.

Overall Imperial REF results

Overall quality profile

Imperial College London REF 2014 results - Overall quality profile

The results achieved by Imperial in the 2014 REF for each unit of assessment that the College submitted to are given below.

  Cat A FTEOverall quality profile (percentage of research activity at each quality level)
UoAUoA Description4*3*2*1*u/c
1 Clinical Medicine 334 48 38 13 1 0
2 Public Health, Health Services and Primary Care 55 57 34 8 0 1
4 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience 44 50 42 7 1 0
5 Biological Sciences 100 51 40 8 1 0
8 Chemistry 55 34 62 4 0 0
9 Physics 117 35 57 7 1 0
10 Mathematical Sciences 100 44 47 8 1 0
11 Computer Science and Informatics 49 56 38 6 0 0
12 Aeronautical, Mechanical, Chemical and Manufacturing Engineering 173 46 43 10 1 0
13 A- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 44 49 48 3 0 0
13 B - Metallurgy and Materials 37 44 55 1 0 0
14 Civil and Construction Engineering 57 47 48 5 0 0
15 General Engineering 34 44 51 5 0 0
19 Business and Management Studies 58 49 43 7 1 0

Note: HEFCE provide the overall quality profile to the nearest integer and the Category A FTE to the nearest 0.1; however all data in this table is presented to the nearest integer.

Data definitions
ItemDefinition
Cat A Category A staff: Academic staff in post on 31 October 2013 who were selected for submission into the REF
FTE Full Time Equivalent
4* Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour.
3* Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour but which falls short of the highest standards of excellence.
2* Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour.
1* Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour.
Unclassified Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of assessment.