In this section
Our research includes exploring fundamental pore scale fluid dynamics, developing digital rocks analysis techniques, increasing the accuracy of field scale reservoir simulation, and evaluating the feasibility of scaling up CO2 storage to climate relevant scales.
StrataTrapper Advanced Modelling of CO2 Migration and Trapping
THMC4CCS: ThorougH experiMental and numerical investigation of Coupled processes for geologiC Carbon Storage
@article{Lai:2015:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.07.010,
author = {Lai, P and Moulton, K and Krevor, S},
doi = {10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.07.010},
journal = {Chemical Geology},
pages = {260--273},
title = {Pore-scale heterogeneity in the mineral distribution and reactive surface area of porous rocks},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.07.010},
volume = {411},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR
AB - The reactive surface area is an important control on interfacial processes between minerals and aqueous fluids in porous rocks. Spatial heterogeneity in the surface area can lead to complications in modelling reactive transport processes, but quantitative characterisation of this property has been limited. In this paper 3D images obtained using x-ray micro-tomography were used to characterise heterogeneity in surface area in one sandstone and five carbonate rocks. Measurements of average surface area from x-ray imagery were 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than measurements from nitrogen BET. A roughness factor, defined as the ratio of BET surface area to x-ray based surface area, was correlated to the presence of clay or microporosity. Co-registered images of Berea sandstone from x-ray and energy dispersive spectroscopy imagery were used to guide the identification of quartz, K-feldspar, dolomite, calcite and clays in x-ray images. In Berea sandstone, clay and K-feldspar had higheraverage surface area fractions than their volumetric fractions in the rock. In the Edwards carbonate, however, modal mineral composition correlated with surface area. By sub-sampling digital images, statistical distributions of the surface area were generated at various length scales of subsampling. Comparing these to distributions used in published modelling studies showed that the common practice of leaving surface area and pore volume uncorrelated in a pore has lead to unrealistic combinations of surface area and pore volume in the models. We suggest these models adopt a moderate correlation based on observations. In Berea sandstone, constraining ratios of surface area to pore volume to a range of values between that of quartz-lined and five times that of clay-lined spheres appeared sufficient.
AU - Lai,P
AU - Moulton,K
AU - Krevor,S
DO - 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.07.010
EP - 273
PY - 2015///
SN - 0009-2541
SP - 260
TI - Pore-scale heterogeneity in the mineral distribution and reactive surface area of porous rocks
T2 - Chemical Geology
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.07.010
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/25107
VL - 411
ER -