Citation

BibTex format

@article{Chan:2025:10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7,
author = {Chan, AHH and Dunning, J and Beck, KB and Burke, T and Chik, HYJ and Dunleavy, D and Evans, T and Ferreira, A and Fourie, B and Griffith, SC and Hillemann, F and Schroeder, J},
doi = {10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7},
journal = {Behav Ecol Sociobiol},
title = {Animal social networks are robust to changing association definitions.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7},
volume = {79},
year = {2025}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - UNLABELLED: The interconnecting links between individuals in an animal social network are often defined by discrete, directed behaviours, but where these are difficult to observe, a network link (edge) may instead be defined by individuals sharing a space at the same time, which can then be used to infer a social association. The method by which these associations are defined should be informed by the biological significance of edges, and therefore often vary between studies. Identifying an appropriate measure of association remains a challenge to behavioural ecologists. Here, we use automatically recorded feeder visit data from four bird systems to compare three methods to identify a social association: (1) strict time-window, (2) co-occurrence in a group, and (3) arrival-time. We tested the similarity of the resulting networks by comparing the repeatability and sensitivity of individuals' social traits (network degree, strength, betweenness). We found that networks constructed using different methods but applying similar, ecologically relevant definitions of associations based on individuals' spatio-temporal co-occurrence, showed similar characteristics. Our findings suggest that the different methods to construct animal social networks are comparable, but result in subtle differences driven by species biology and feeder design. We urge researchers to carefully evaluate the ecological context of their study systems when making methodological decisions. Specifically, researchers in ecology and evolution should carefully consider the biological relevance of an edge in animal social networks, and the implications of adopting different definitions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7.
AU  - Chan,AHH
AU  - Dunning,J
AU  - Beck,KB
AU  - Burke,T
AU  - Chik,HYJ
AU  - Dunleavy,D
AU  - Evans,T
AU  - Ferreira,A
AU  - Fourie,B
AU  - Griffith,SC
AU  - Hillemann,F
AU  - Schroeder,J
DO  - 10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7
PY  - 2025///
SN  - 0340-5443
TI  - Animal social networks are robust to changing association definitions.
T2  - Behav Ecol Sociobiol
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-025-03559-7
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39927187
VL  - 79
ER  -
Download

Note to staff:  Adding new publications to a research group

  1. Log in to Symplectic.
  2. Click on Menu > Create Links
  3. Choose what you want to create links between – in this case ‘Publications’ and ‘Organisational structures’.
  4. Choose the organisational structure (research group) into which you want to link the publications and check the box next to it.
  5. Now check the box of any publication you want to add to that group. You can use the filters to find what you want and select multiple publications if necessary. 
  6. Scroll to the bottom and click the blue ‘Create new link’ button to link them.
  7. The publications will be added to the group, and will be displayed on the group publications feed within 24 hours (it is not immediate).

Any problems, talk to Tim Evans or the Faculty Web Team.